These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even if the transaction occurred previous to its promulgation. Read more
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual length of service pretty much violates your complete service framework for a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming this sort of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention with the legislation nor from the equity. Read more
In the event the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according towards the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and also private respondents and will acquire care of each of the elements of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Generally speaking, higher courts will not have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the reduced courts.
Inside the United States, individuals are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in both civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember one rule of thumb when it relates to referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as is possible, leading the court, not only for the case, but for the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same type of case.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and the case shall be decided from the competent court of law if pending. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is website entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.